• AML
  • Qui Tam
  • SEC
  • CFTC
  • FCPA
  • FAQS
Demand Protections for Artificial Intelligence Whistleblowers | Take Action!
Subscribe
Donate
Get Help
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
The Truth at Any Cost.
Qui Tam, Compliance and Anti-Corruption News.
Whistleblower Network News
No Result
View All Result
Home False Claims-Qui Tam

Following “Dangerous” Thomas Dissent, Court Filings Question Constitutionality of FCA’s Qui Tam Provisions

Geoff SchwellerbyGeoff Schweller
September 12, 2023
in False Claims-Qui Tam
Reading Time: 5 mins read
Supreme Court Decision has Implications for Whistleblowers
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail

In a June False Claims Act (FCA) whistleblower case, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a dissent containing language which questioned the constitutionality of the FCA’s whistleblower provisions. In the following months, multiple motions have been filed which pick up on Thomas’ line of reasoning and pose an existential threat to the United States’ most important and effective anti-fraud law.

In the June Supreme Court case, United States, ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, the Court issued an 8-1 ruling granting the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) the authority to dismiss qui tam whistleblower lawsuits in cases in which it chose not to intervene.

Under the FCA’s qui tam provisions, whistleblowers with knowledge of fraud are able to bring a lawsuit against the fraudster on behalf of the U.S. government. The DOJ is able to intervene and take over the lawsuit, but if it chooses not to intervene the whistleblower may continue to pursue the case of the government’s behalf. The Polansky ruling clarifies that the DOJ has the authority to intervene at any point during a qui tam lawsuit and then dismiss the suit, even if it had previously chosen to not intervene.

Register for National Whistleblower Day Register for National Whistleblower Day Register for National Whistleblower Day

While this ruling was seen as damaging to the FCA, whistleblower advocates were even more alarmed by language in the dissent issued by Thomas who wrote that the FCA has “long inhabited something of a constitutional twilight zone.”

 “There are substantial arguments that the qui tam device is inconsistent with Article II and that private relators may not represent the interests of the United States in litigation,” stated Thomas suggesting that qui tam suits violate Article II of the Constitution which vests the power to litigate on behalf of the government to the executive branch.

Thomas states that it “appears to follow that Congress cannot authorize a private relator to wield executive authority to represent the United States’ interests in civil litigation.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a concurrence joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, agreed with Thomas, writing that “[t]he court should consider the competing arguments on the Article II issue in an appropriate case.”

“The position of Justice Thomas’s dissent is both dangerous and reckless,” said whistleblower attorney David Colapinto of Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto at the time of the decision. “This is a green light to every government contractor accused of fraud to argue that a whistleblower’s False Claims Act lawsuit in a declined case is unconstitutional despite the statute that says that whistleblowers can pursue these claims even if the government declines to intervene.”

So far, Colapinto’s warning of a “green light” appears to be prescient as at least two challenges have been filed in recent months questioning the constitutionality of the FCA’s qui tam provisions along the lines outlined by Thomas. 

In August, counsel for orthopedic implant maker Exactech filed a brief with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama requesting that a qui tam whistleblower suit against the company be dismissed. Exactech is accused of violating the FCA by providing purportedly defective knee implants.

Citing extensively to Thomas’ dissent, the Exactech brief argues that the qui tam suit is unconstitutional because it violates Article II.

A similar argument is outlined in a filing with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas submitted by Planned Parenthood on September 1. Planned Parenthood is faced with a qui tam lawsuit filed by an anonymous anti-abortion activist accusing the organization of defrauding Medicaid.

Citing to the Thomas dissent, Planned Parenthood seeks to have the lawsuit dismissed on the grounds that the qui tam provisions of the FCA violate Article II of the Constitution.

“Declaring whistleblower rights under the False Claims Act unconstitutional would do great damage to a law that has been on the books for 37 years and that has helped the United States recover over $70 billion from government contractors that have defrauded taxpayers during that time,” says Colapinto.

Further Reading:

SCOTUS Rules to Not Curb DOJ’s Dismissals of Qui Tam Whistleblower Suits

Planned Parenthood seeks to overturn US whistleblower fraud law

Supreme Court dissent sparks new threat for False Claims Act suits

More False Claims Act Whistleblower News

Previous Post

SEC Sanctions Privately Held Company for Violating Whistleblower Protection Rule

Next Post

Stop Penalizing Heroes, End Double Taxation of Whistleblowers

Geoff Schweller

Geoff Schweller

Geoff Schweller is the Assistant News Editor for Whistleblower Network News. He coordinates news coverage, and also writes about breaking whistleblower news, SEC whistleblowers, IRS whistleblowers, CFTC whistleblowers, and federal employee whistleblowers. Geoff graduated from Hamilton College with a degree in Sociology and minors in French & Francophone Studies and Cinema & New Media Studies.

Next Post
IRS Whistleblower

Stop Penalizing Heroes, End Double Taxation of Whistleblowers

Receive Daily Alerts

Subscribe to receive daily breaking news and legislative developments sent to your inbox.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Most Popular

SEC Should Continue Strong Crypto Enforcement, Whistleblower Advocates Argue

Advocate Details Impact of Bipartisan AI Whistleblower Bill for Tech Works

CFTC Awards $700,000 to Whistleblower for “Courage” and “Critical Role in Enforcement Efforts”

Whistleblowers to Receive Up to $920K after Alleging Fraud in Breast Cancer Testing

Supreme Court Upholds, For Now, Trump Firing of MSPB Chair

Whistleblower Suit Leads to $3.3 Million Stark Law Settlement

Whistleblower Poll

Whistleblower Poll
Whistleblower Poll

Exclusive Marist Poll: Overwhelming Public Support Among Likely Voters For Increased Whistleblower Protections

byGeoff Schweller
October 6, 2020

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

STAY INFORMED.
Subscribe to receive breaking whistleblower updates.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

About Us

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Careers

Subscribe

  • Daily Mail
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • YouTube Channel

Contribute

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Reprint Guidelines

Your Experience

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Help

  • Rules for Whistleblowers
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Advertise
Whistleblower Network News

Whistleblower Network News is an independent online newspaper providing our readers with up-to-date information on whistleblowing. Our goal is to be the best source of information on important qui tam, anti-corruption, compliance, and whistleblower law developments.

Submit an Article

Copyright © 2025, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

This Newspaper/Web Site is made available by the publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Newspaper/Web Site publisher. The Newspaper/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Become a Whistleblower Network News Subscriber

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Subscribe to WNN

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Subscribe to WNN
Join the Waitlist for National Whistleblower Day 2025! July 30, 2025 on Capitol Hill
JOIN WAITLIST

Add New Playlist

Demand Protections for Artificial Intelligence Whistleblowers

Take Action!
No Result
View All Result
  • Exclusives
  • Government
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Federal Employees
    • Intelligence
  • Corporate
    • CFTC & Commodities
    • Dodd-Frank
    • IRS & Tax
    • SEC & Securities
  • Features
  • Legislation
  • International
    • Foreign Corruption
  • Rewards
  • Whistleblower of the Week
  • Environment & Climate
  • Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Employment
    • Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers
    • Retaliation
    • OSHA
  • Make National Whistleblower Day Permanent
  • Media
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • National Whistleblower Day
  • Whistleblower Poll
  • Whistleblower Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Resources for Locating An Attorney
    • The New Whistleblowers Handbook

Copyright © 2024, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version