• Qui Tam
  • SEC
  • CFTC
  • FCPA
  • NWC Supporters Directory
  • FAQS
Subscribe
Donate
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
The Truth at Any Cost.
Qui Tam, Compliance and Anti-Corruption News.
Whistleblower Network News
  • Qui Tam
  • SEC
  • CFTC
  • FCPA
  • NWC Supporters Directory
  • FAQS
Subscribe
Donate
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
No Result
View All Result
Home False Claims-Qui Tam

Historic Ruling in D.C. Circuit Reverses Order that Requires False Claims Act Plaintiffs to Pay Discovery Costs

Ben KostyackbyBen Kostyack
March 31, 2020
in False Claims-Qui Tam, News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Tax Court Decision:  Congress Needs to Act to Ensure No Holiday for Big Time Tax Cheats

Closeup of gavel in court room

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail

On Friday, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) reversed an order that had required a qui tam whistleblower to pay over $58,000 in e-discovery court costs to the multinational defense contractor KBR. The precedent-setting decision barred defendants in civil litigation from billing whistleblowers tens of thousands of dollars for discovery costs.

In a unanimous decision made in the case of U.S. ex rel. Harry Barko v. KBR et al., the D.C. Circuit ruled, “Congress ‘allowed only for the taxation of the costs of making copies.’” And held that “identifying stacks of potentially relevant materials, culling those materials for documents containing specific keywords, screening those culled documents for potential privilege issues, Bates-stamping each screened document, and mailing discovery materials to opposing counsel” are “untaxable now.”

Barko’s case initially brought under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act in 2005, alleged Halliburton subsidiary KBR of fraudulently billing tens of millions of dollars in illegal construction activity during the Iraq War.

Support Whistleblower Network News

“If plaintiffs were required to pay defendants costs incurred for e-discovery, a simple wrongful discharge case could trigger thousands of dollars in court costs if the plaintiff did not prevail,” said whistleblower attorney Michael D. Kohn, partner at Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto and lead counsel for Harry Barko. “This burden would have a chilling effect on the willingness of whistleblowers and victims of civil rights abuses to bring cases in federal court. Today’s ruling puts an end to this dangerous practice and ensures that federal courts will remain open to the rich and the poor.”

Read the opinion: United States of America, ex rel. Harry Barko, Appellant v. Halliburton Company, et al., Appellees, Decided March 27, 2020

Read the orders:

– United States of America, ex rel. Harry Barko, Appellant v. Halliburton Company, et al., Appellees, March 27, 2020, Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia

– SEC Enforcement Action Against KBR for Non-Disclosure Agreements

– United States of America, ex rel. Harry Barko, and Harry Barko, Appellant v. Halliburton Company, et al., Appellees (Clerk Order)

 

Tags: False Claims/Qui Tamqui tam whistleblowers
Previous Post

Unsafe and Unsound: How Citizens Suffer under the UK’s Outdated Whistleblower Protection System

Next Post

Federal Spending Due to Coronavirus Outbreak Will Trigger Fraud, Whistleblower Attorney Says

Ben Kostyack

Ben Kostyack

Ben Kostyack is an Assistant News Editor for Whistleblower Network News. He writes about breaking whistleblower news, and False Claims Act whistleblowers, SEC whistleblowers, IRS whistleblowers, FCPA whistleblowers, and CFTC whistleblowers. Ben has a degree in Journalism with a minor in Economics from the University of Massachusetts Amherst. He was a communications intern at the whistleblower law firm Kohn, Kohn and Colapinto during the summer of 2018.

Next Post
Report Suggests If China Had Listened to Whistleblower, 95% of Coronavirus Infections Could Have Been Prevented

Federal Spending Due to Coronavirus Outbreak Will Trigger Fraud, Whistleblower Attorney Says

Please login to join discussion

Receive Daily Alerts

Subscribe to receive daily breaking news and legislative developments sent to your inbox.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Most Popular

Switzerland Seeks to Prosecute Suisse Secrets Whistleblower

Online Course Aims to Improve Collaboration Between Anti-Corruption Officers and Whistleblowers

SEC Charges Activision With Violating Whistleblower Protection Rule

SEC Accepting Whistleblower Award Claims for FCPA Bribery Cases

“I couldn’t go along with it any longer.” — WNN Exclusive Interview with Matthew Hoh

SEC Awards $1 Million to Whistleblower Who Caused Opening of Investigation

Whistleblower Poll

Whistleblower Poll
Whistleblower Poll

Exclusive Marist Poll: Overwhelming Public Support Among Likely Voters For Increased Whistleblower Protections

byGeoff Schweller
October 6, 2020

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

STAY INFORMED.
Subscribe to receive breaking whistleblower updates.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

About Us

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Careers

Subscribe

  • Daily Mail
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • YouTube Channel

Contribute

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Reprint Guidelines

Your Experience

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Help

  • The Whistleblowers Handbook
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Advertise
Whistleblower Network News

Whistleblower Network News is an independent online newspaper providing our readers with up-to-date information on whistleblowing. Our goal is to be the best source of information on important qui tam, anti-corruption, compliance, and whistleblower law developments. 

Submit an Article

Copyright © 2021, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

This Newspaper/Web Site is made available by the publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Newspaper/Web Site publisher. The Newspaper/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

No Result
View All Result
  • Exclusives
  • Government
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Federal Employees
    • Intelligence
  • Corporate
    • CFTC & Commodities
    • Dodd-Frank
    • IRS & Tax
    • SEC & Securities
  • Features
  • Legislation
  • International
    • Foreign Corruption
  • Rewards
  • Whistleblower of the Week
  • Environment & Climate
  • Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Employment
    • Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers
    • Retaliation
    • OSHA
  • Media
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • National Whistleblower Day
  • Whistleblower Poll
  • Whistleblower Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Resources for Locating An Attorney
    • The New Whistleblowers Handbook
  • National Whistleblower Day ’23

Copyright © 2020, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

Become a Whistleblower Network News Subscriber

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Subscribe to WNN

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Subscribe to WNN

Add New Playlist

Go to mobile version