• AML
  • Qui Tam
  • SEC
  • CFTC
  • FCPA
  • FAQS
Demand Protections for Artificial Intelligence Whistleblowers | Take Action!
Subscribe
Donate
Get Help
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
The Truth at Any Cost.
Qui Tam, Compliance and Anti-Corruption News.
Whistleblower Network News
No Result
View All Result
Home Corporate IRS & Tax

Third Circuit allows compensation for tax consequences

WNN StaffbyWNN Staff
February 11, 2009
in IRS & Tax, Legislation, News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail

When whistleblowers win their cases, it is often years after they got fired. When a judge adds up all the years of back pay, the whistleblower will then have to pay taxes from a higher tax bracket. Whistleblowers can end up getting less than what would have happened had they never been fired.

Last month, the federal Third Circuit Court of Appeals recognized this problem and allowed a court to increase a plaintiff’s award to compensate for the negative tax consequence of getting back pay in a lump sum. The decision is Eshelman v. Agere Systems, Inc., No. 05-4895 (3d Cir. Jan. 30, 2009). The decision highlights the need for the Civil Rights Tax Relief Act.

Register for National Whistleblower Day Register for National Whistleblower Day Register for National Whistleblower Day

Joan Eshelman started working for Western Electric in 1981. Over twenty years, and more than one change in corporate ownership, Joan became a supervisor in the Chief Information Office for Lucent Technologies in Reading, Pennsylvania. Tragedy struck Joan when she was diagnosed with breast cancer. She needed time off from work, and chemotherapy. Still, she received excellent evaluations, raises and promotions. In 2001, however, the new owners, Agere Systems, chose Joan for a layoff.

Joan sued claiming that she was selected on account of her perceived disability. A jury agreed and awarded $170,000 in back pay and $30,000 in compensatory damages. The company asked the judge to set aside the jury verdict, and Eshelman’s attorneys asked the judge to increase the amount of backpay to compensate Eshelman for the tax consequences of being in a higher tax bracket. The judge agreed with Eshelman’s attorneys and increased the award by $6,893. Agere appealed.

The Court of Appeals affirmed on all counts. As to the upward adjustment for the tax consequences, the Court noted that in the Americans with Disabilities Act, “Congress armed the courts with broad equitable powers to effectuate this ‘make whole’ remedy.” Whistleblower laws, of course, have the same provision for “make whole” remedies. Citing the Supreme Court decision in Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405, 418 (1975), the Court said that district courts are granted wide discretion to “locate ‘a just result’” regarding the parameters of the relief granted in the circumstances of each case. Courts should endeavor “to restore the employee to the economic status quo that would exist but for the employer’s conduct.”

As backpay awards are taxable in the year paid, “employees may be subject to higher taxes if they receive a lump sum back pay award in a given year.” The Court noticed that the Tenth Circuit reached the same result in Sears v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 749 F.2d 1451 (10th Cir. 1984). Without this type of equitable relief in appropriate cases, it would not be possible “to restore the employee to the economic status quo that would exist but for the employer’s conduct.” The Court compared the tax compensation award to prejudgment interest, which also “serves to compensate a plaintiff for the loss of the use of money that the plaintiff otherwise would have earned had he not been unjustly discharged.” Front pay awards and restoration of seniority can serve similar purposes. “This type of an award, as with prejudgment interest, represents a recognition that
the harm to a prevailing employee’s pecuniary interest may be broader in scope than just a loss of back pay,” the Court added. “Accordingly, either or both types of equitable relief may be necessary to achieve complete restoration of the prevailing employee’s economic status quo and to assure ‘the most complete relief possible.’”

Eshelman’s attorneys submitted an affidavit of an economic expert who computed the amount needed to compensate Eshelman for the higher tax bracket. The Court accepted this affidavit as the basis of the award.

This decision highlights the need for Congress to pass the Civil Rights Tax Relief Act (CRTRA). This proposal would change the tax laws so that victims of discrimination would be taxed at the rate that they would have had if they were paid their wages on time, instead of in a lump sum. CRTRA would also give compensatory damage awards the same tax treatment that personal injury awards get. Now that the courts are making employers pay for the adverse tax consequences, maybe the employers will join with civil rights attorneys in calling on Congress to pass CRTRA.

 

Tags: IRS & Tax
Previous Post

Whistleblowers Sought for Survey

Next Post

Employee Rights Advocacy Institute receives grant for opinion research

WNN Staff

WNN Staff

Whistleblower Network News is an independent online newspaper providing our readers with up-to-date information on whistleblowing. Our goal is to be the best source of information on important qui tam, anti-corruption, compliance, and whistleblower law developments. We will focus on the SEC, IRS, and Commodities whistleblower programs, qui tam and False Claims Act litigation, and critical anti-corruption programs, such as cases filed by the Department of Justice under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Whistleblower Network News covers national and international legal developments and publishes editorial and opinion articles on whistleblowing and compliance issues.

Next Post

Employee Rights Advocacy Institute receives grant for opinion research

Please login to join discussion

Receive Daily Alerts

Subscribe to receive daily breaking news and legislative developments sent to your inbox.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Most Popular

SEC Should Continue Strong Crypto Enforcement, Whistleblower Advocates Argue

Advocate Details Impact of Bipartisan AI Whistleblower Bill for Tech Works

CFTC Awards $700,000 to Whistleblower for “Courage” and “Critical Role in Enforcement Efforts”

Whistleblowers to Receive Up to $920K after Alleging Fraud in Breast Cancer Testing

Supreme Court Upholds, For Now, Trump Firing of MSPB Chair

Whistleblower Suit Leads to $3.3 Million Stark Law Settlement

Whistleblower Poll

Whistleblower Poll
Whistleblower Poll

Exclusive Marist Poll: Overwhelming Public Support Among Likely Voters For Increased Whistleblower Protections

byGeoff Schweller
October 6, 2020

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

STAY INFORMED.
Subscribe to receive breaking whistleblower updates.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

About Us

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Careers

Subscribe

  • Daily Mail
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • YouTube Channel

Contribute

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Reprint Guidelines

Your Experience

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Help

  • Rules for Whistleblowers
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Advertise
Whistleblower Network News

Whistleblower Network News is an independent online newspaper providing our readers with up-to-date information on whistleblowing. Our goal is to be the best source of information on important qui tam, anti-corruption, compliance, and whistleblower law developments.

Submit an Article

Copyright © 2025, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

This Newspaper/Web Site is made available by the publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Newspaper/Web Site publisher. The Newspaper/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Become a Whistleblower Network News Subscriber

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Subscribe to WNN

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Subscribe to WNN
Join the Waitlist for National Whistleblower Day 2025! July 30, 2025 on Capitol Hill
JOIN WAITLIST

Add New Playlist

Demand Protections for Artificial Intelligence Whistleblowers

Take Action!
No Result
View All Result
  • Exclusives
  • Government
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Federal Employees
    • Intelligence
  • Corporate
    • CFTC & Commodities
    • Dodd-Frank
    • IRS & Tax
    • SEC & Securities
  • Features
  • Legislation
  • International
    • Foreign Corruption
  • Rewards
  • Whistleblower of the Week
  • Environment & Climate
  • Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Employment
    • Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers
    • Retaliation
    • OSHA
  • Make National Whistleblower Day Permanent
  • Media
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • National Whistleblower Day
  • Whistleblower Poll
  • Whistleblower Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Resources for Locating An Attorney
    • The New Whistleblowers Handbook

Copyright © 2024, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version