• AML
  • Qui Tam
  • SEC
  • CFTC
  • FCPA
  • FAQS
Subscribe
Donate
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
The Truth at Any Cost.
Qui Tam, Compliance and Anti-Corruption News.
Whistleblower Network News
No Result
View All Result
Home Government

FBI Continues Culture of Retaliation Against Whistleblowers

Mary Jane WilmothbyMary Jane Wilmoth
October 2, 2014
in Government, Intelligence Community, News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail

Yesterday, Senator Chuck Grassley announced that 11 whistleblowers have come forward revealing that FBI managers are now using Loss of Effectiveness orders to retaliate against FBI employees who report wrongdoing in the agency.

“Every time we bring this to the administration’s attention, more whistleblowers come forward,” Grassley said. “These whistleblowers never have the opportunity to make their case. It’s stereotypical treatment of whistleblowers for the executive branch.”

An FBI internal inquiry reportedly agrees that this is a problem. According to whistleblowers, the FBI Office of Integrity and Compliance has drafted a report calling for reform and more transparency in the use of Loss of Effectiveness orders.

Register for National Whistleblower Day

The whistleblowers allege that Loss of Effectiveness orders allow managers to bypass the Office of Professional Responsibility and avoid basic due process. Reviews of allegations before the Office of Professional Responsibility give employees the opportunity to defend against those allegations. A Loss of Effectiveness order does not provide an employee a right of appeal or notice of the underlying allegations against them.

Grassley’s latest letter to FBI Director James Comey outlines specific allegations by one whistleblower about how the FBI used a Loss of Effectiveness order to retaliate against him. The whistleblower claims that, at the behest of his supervisor, the FBI Inspection Division issued a Loss of Effectiveness Electronic Communication on fabricated grounds against him in retaliation for his identification of inefficiencies in curriculum management and business process.

Grassley first brought this matter to the attention of Comey in May during a regular oversight hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Grassley followed up on May 22, 2014, with the Justice Department Inspector General asking the office to investigate allegations of gender discrimination and retaliation within the FBI. In a July 18, 2014, letter Grassley pressed Comey for information about the Loss of Effectiveness orders. On September 26, 2014, the FBI finally answered with a letter dated Sept. 25, 2014. This response, which fails to answer many of Grassley’s questions, was sent only after Grassley reminded the FBI of its outstanding response in his most recent letter.

Links:

The text of Grassley’s Sept. 25, 2014, letter to Comey can be here. July 18, 2014, letter to Comey can be found here. The May 22, 2014, letter to the Inspector General can be found here.

Previous post on Senator Grassley’s oversight of the FBI can be found here.

Tags: Department of JusticeFBI WhistleblowersSen. Charles GrassleyWhistleblower Protections
Previous Post

Attorney General Supports Increased Whistleblower Protections Under Federal Banking Laws FIRREA

Next Post

ARB Decision Promotes Clarity And Uniformity In Whistleblower Cases

Mary Jane Wilmoth

Mary Jane Wilmoth

Mary Jane Wilmoth is the publisher of Whistleblower Network News, where she heads the editorial staff. She writes about breaking whistleblower news, and False Claims Act whistleblowers, SEC whistleblowers, IRS whistleblowers, FCPA whistleblowers, and CFTC whistleblowers. Mary Jane is the managing partner at the whistleblower law firm Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto, and a frequent contributor to The Whistleblower and Qui Tam Blog. She is a licensed attorney in the District of Columbia and a graduate of the University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center).

Next Post

ARB Decision Promotes Clarity And Uniformity In Whistleblower Cases

Please login to join discussion

Receive Daily Alerts

Subscribe to receive daily breaking news and legislative developments sent to your inbox.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Most Popular

Calls Grow for Law Protecting AI Whistleblowers

Advocates Detail Need for SEC Whistleblower Reform

Raytheon Whistleblower Receives $1.5 Million for Alleging Cybersecurity Non-Compliance

Ruling Striking Down Trump Order Targeting Law Firm Seen as Crucial for Whistleblowers

MJH Healthcare Settles Whistleblower Allegations of Postal Rate Fraud for $2 Million

Poll Shows Overwhelming Support for Stronger Whistleblower Laws in Australia, Mirroring Polling in US

Whistleblower Poll

Whistleblower Poll
Whistleblower Poll

Exclusive Marist Poll: Overwhelming Public Support Among Likely Voters For Increased Whistleblower Protections

byGeoff Schweller
October 6, 2020

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

STAY INFORMED.
Subscribe to receive breaking whistleblower updates.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

About Us

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Careers

Subscribe

  • Daily Mail
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • YouTube Channel

Contribute

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Reprint Guidelines

Your Experience

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Help

  • Rules for Whistleblowers
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Advertise
Whistleblower Network News

Whistleblower Network News is an independent online newspaper providing our readers with up-to-date information on whistleblowing. Our goal is to be the best source of information on important qui tam, anti-corruption, compliance, and whistleblower law developments. 

Submit an Article

Copyright © 2025, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

This Newspaper/Web Site is made available by the publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Newspaper/Web Site publisher. The Newspaper/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Become a Whistleblower Network News Subscriber

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Subscribe to WNN

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Subscribe to WNN
RSVP to National Whistleblower Day 2025! July 30, 2025 on Capitol Hill
RSVP NOW

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Exclusives
  • Government
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Federal Employees
    • Intelligence
  • Corporate
    • CFTC & Commodities
    • Dodd-Frank
    • IRS & Tax
    • SEC & Securities
  • Features
  • Legislation
  • International
    • Foreign Corruption
  • Rewards
  • Whistleblower of the Week
  • Environment & Climate
  • Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Employment
    • Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers
    • Retaliation
    • OSHA
  • Make National Whistleblower Day Permanent
  • Media
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • National Whistleblower Day
  • Whistleblower Poll
  • Whistleblower Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Resources for Locating An Attorney
    • The New Whistleblowers Handbook

Copyright © 2024, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version