• Qui Tam
  • SEC
  • CFTC
  • FCPA
  • Whistleblower Resources
  • FAQS
Subscribe
Donate
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
The Truth at Any Cost.
Qui Tam, Compliance and Anti-Corruption News.
SIGN THE PETITION FOR NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER DAY IN 2023
Whistleblower Network News
  • Qui Tam
  • SEC
  • CFTC
  • FCPA
  • Whistleblower Resources
  • FAQS
Subscribe
Donate
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
No Result
View All Result
Home Features

Price-Fixing Lawsuit Could Help Blow the Whistle on Commodities Fraud in the Oil Industry

Laura PetersonbyLaura Peterson
April 15, 2020
in Features
Reading Time: 4 mins read
Price-Fixing Lawsuit Could Help Blow the Whistle on Commodities Fraud in the Oil Industry
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail

While America begged OPEC to lower oil production to save markets battered by the coronavirus pandemic, a group of commodities traders asked the Supreme Court to finally decide an oil price-fixing case with major implications for how corruption related to this global commodity is regulated here at home.

The case is notable because it involves laws protecting against commodities fraud, rarely used in oil markets. It may also provide a weapon for whistleblowers reporting fraud that occurs at least partially overseas but affects the United States.

Lawyers for a group of New York Mercantile Exchange traders filed a petition with the United States Supreme Court on March 18 asking the court to take up a case that has split appellate courts. The case began in 2013 when the traders filed a class-action lawsuit in federal court naming Shell, BP and Statoil as defendants, along with three oil trading houses and two banks. The suit alleged that the companies reported false transactions to Platts, a company responsible for incorporating daily market information into a price benchmark for oil produced in the North Sea known as Brent crude.

Support Whistleblower Network News

The Brent Crude benchmark—also called a “spot price”—determines prices for oil futures traded on exchanges in New York and London. Futures are contracts between buyers and sellers of commodities based on a future price.

Brent crude prices affect markets around the world and exert such a strong influence on the global economy that changes can affect stocks and other financial markets. The lack of regulation of oil spot prices has been sufficiently concerning that the G20 in 2010 asked the International Organization of Securities Commissions to find ways to ensure integrity of the process.

Plaintiffs in the suit claim “inaccurate, misleading and false” information provided by the companies named in the suit caused oil prices to dip, benefitting the companies’ selling plans but causing commodities traders to lose money. They argued the behavior violated sections of the Commodities Exchange Act prohibiting manipulation of prices.

The court dismissed the case on grounds that because the oil was extracted—and partially traded—outside the United States, the wrongdoing occurred outside the CEA’s domestic jurisdiction. The traders appealed, but the Second Circuit appeals court upheld the original decision in 2019.

However, the Ninth Circuit appeals court decided in a 2018 case also involving U.S. commodities laws in foreign markets (Stoyas v. Toshiba Corp.) that the laws should apply if domestic markets are also involved. The conflict prompted the Supreme Court to ask the opinion of the U.S. Solicitor General, which sided with the Ninth Circuit.

Perhaps more importantly for those involved in commodities markets, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed an amicus curiae, or “friend of the court,” brief in the Second Circuit case supporting the traders (Prime International Trading LTD., et al. v. BP PLC, et al.). The CFTC is an independent U.S. government regulatory agency created in 1974 to regulate futures trading.

The CFTC brief asked the court to reject the argument that the Commodities Exchange Act (CEA) didn’t cover the defendants’ actions because “[n]othing … suggests that a person may intentionally manipulate contracts on a trading facility in the United States with impunity under U.S. law … simply because that person and the means of manipulation were offshore.”

The brief reflects the CFTC’s increased involvement in foreign corruption. In March 2019, the CFTC released an enforcement advisory encouraging companies to disclose “violations of the Commodity Exchange Act involving foreign corrupt practices.” The advisory said the CFTC would work with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ), both of which can enforce the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

The government’s drive to root out overseas corruption that impacts the U.S. economy is complemented by robust whistleblower laws. Under the CFTC’s whistleblower program, created by the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, qualified whistleblowers can receive between 10 percent and 30 percent of penalties collected by a successful enforcement if the penalties awarded top $1 million. Non-U.S. whistleblowers can file for awards, and awards can also be given for actions brought by foreign futures authorities if the whistleblower also reports the same information directly to the CFTC. The office has awarded more than $100 million to whistleblowers to date and collected more than $800 million in sanctions.

Regardless of whether the Supreme Court decides to take on the debate over how far U.S. commodities law stretches, the CFTC’s increased focus on overseas corruption—including the international oil market—is good news for whistleblowers and others seeking to uncover corruption in the fossil fuel industry.

Tags: CFTCCommodity Futures Trading Commission
Previous Post

Whistleblower Complaint Leads to Possible $2 Million Penalty for South Korean Defense Contractor

Next Post

Court Decision Exposes Government Whistleblowers to Retaliatory Investigations

Laura Peterson

Laura Peterson

Next Post
Key Whistleblower Protections Cut from Tax Reform Law, Criminal Fraudsters Protected

Court Decision Exposes Government Whistleblowers to Retaliatory Investigations

Please login to join discussion

Receive Daily Alerts

Subscribe to receive daily breaking news and legislative developments sent to your inbox.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Most Popular

US Attorneys Reflect on UK’s Whistleblowing Awareness Week

OSHA Highlights Railroad Worker Whistleblower Protections in Wake of Train Derailments

AML Whistleblower Law Could Shift the Way DOJ Handles Whistleblowers

Two Powerful Women Whistleblower Pairs to Learn From This Women’s History Month

WNN Exclusive Interview with Social Security Whistleblowers Sarah Carver and Jennifer Griffith — Part 2

Change the Culture, Make National Whistleblower Day Permanent

Whistleblower Poll

Whistleblower Poll
Whistleblower Poll

Exclusive Marist Poll: Overwhelming Public Support Among Likely Voters For Increased Whistleblower Protections

byGeoff Schweller
October 6, 2020

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

STAY INFORMED.
Subscribe to receive breaking whistleblower updates.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

About Us

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Careers

Subscribe

  • Daily Mail
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • YouTube Channel

Contribute

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Reprint Guidelines

Your Experience

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Help

  • The Whistleblowers Handbook
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Advertise
Whistleblower Network News

Whistleblower Network News is an independent online newspaper providing our readers with up-to-date information on whistleblowing. Our goal is to be the best source of information on important qui tam, anti-corruption, compliance, and whistleblower law developments. 

Submit an Article

Copyright © 2021, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

This Newspaper/Web Site is made available by the publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Newspaper/Web Site publisher. The Newspaper/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

SIGN THE PETITION FOR NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER DAY IN 2023
No Result
View All Result
  • Exclusives
  • Government
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Federal Employees
    • Intelligence
  • Corporate
    • CFTC & Commodities
    • Dodd-Frank
    • IRS & Tax
    • SEC & Securities
  • Features
  • Legislation
  • International
    • Foreign Corruption
  • Rewards
  • Whistleblower of the Week
  • Environment & Climate
  • Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Employment
    • Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers
    • Retaliation
    • OSHA
  • Media
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • National Whistleblower Day
  • Whistleblower Poll
  • Whistleblower Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Resources for Locating An Attorney
    • The New Whistleblowers Handbook
  • National Whistleblower Day ’23

Copyright © 2020, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

Become a Whistleblower Network News Subscriber

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Subscribe to WNN

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Subscribe to WNN

Add New Playlist

Go to mobile version