• AML
  • Qui Tam
  • SEC
  • CFTC
  • FCPA
  • FAQS
Demand Protections for Artificial Intelligence Whistleblowers | Take Action!
Subscribe
Donate
Get Help
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
The Truth at Any Cost.
Qui Tam, Compliance and Anti-Corruption News.
Whistleblower Network News
No Result
View All Result
Home Editorial

Unsafe and Unsound: How Citizens Suffer under the UK’s Outdated Whistleblower Protection System

March 30, 2020
in Editorial
Reading Time: 5 mins read
Unsafe and Unsound: How Citizens Suffer under the UK’s Outdated Whistleblower Protection System
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail

In 1998 the UK passed the first whistleblower protection law in Europe. Policy-makers and anti-corruption activists praised the Public Interest Disclosure Act (PIDA) as “revolutionary” and “the new gold standard.” One prominent activist said the “unbelievably fortunate” event was thanks to “a whole sequence of stars and planets in happy alignment.” PIDA, one employment lawyer said, will “protect you and your job.”

Two decades later, these hope-filled prognostications have been shown to be grossly over-optimistic.

Only 17 percent of employees fired after reporting wrongdoing win their unfair dismissal cases, according to an analysis by the European Center for Whistleblower Rights. The Berlin-based organization reviewed 115 PIDA cases published last year by UK Employment Tribunals.

Register for National Whistleblower Day Register for National Whistleblower Day Register for National Whistleblower Day

Additionally, none of the three employees who sought interim relief won their Tribunal case, nor did the one employee who asked a Tribunal to be reinstated to their job.

The average PIDA case took 16.4 months to conclude – from when the retaliation began to when the Tribunal issued its ruling, the European Center found. One case persisted for six years. The average compensation for people who won their PIDA cases was £28,010 – slightly less than the average one-year salary in the UK.

Contrary to the employment lawyer’s promise in 1998 that PIDA would “protect you and your job,” these case files expose a system in which the deck is firmed stacked against whistleblowers. It is easy to understand why one victimized employee called the UK’s system a “dead-end labyrinth.”

Causal Links and Reason Shopping

PIDA grants judges vast subjectivity and leeway to reject whistleblower retaliation claims. Tribunals have ruled against employees even while acknowledging they met the legal definition of “whistleblower,” were acting in the public interest, and were unfairly dismissed. Some judges went so far as to acknowledge a connection between the whistleblowing and the dismissal, yet still, rule against the employee.

One judge noted a “clear causal link” yet ruled against the employee because his disclosure didn’t “materially influence the decision to dismiss.” Another judge said an employee “reasonably believed” his disclosure “was a matter of public interest,” but that “we are not satisfied there is any causal connection with any of his disclosures.” Another judge said an employee was unfairly dismissed but found no evidence his disclosure “played any part in the decision to dismiss.” In none of these cases did the judges explain how they knew the whistleblowing was not a factor in the dismissal – or what the threshold would be for demonstrating this.

In many other Tribunal cases, employees lost because they could not meet PIDA’s requirement to prove they were fired for being a whistleblower. This is a near-impossibility in real-life situations. Only the most foolish manager would confess to an employee that he or she was fired for reporting misconduct. Lacking such evidence, employees have great difficulty proving this was the reason.

Thus, the door is opened for employers to concoct phony grounds for firing whistleblowers. Tribunal case files confirm that employers routinely engage in “reason shopping” to win retaliation cases. Under PIDA, judges permit employers to utilize this tactic. While hunting for alternative reasons to fire whistleblowers, employers subject them to character assassination and professional smears.

Perhaps the most commonly utilized reason is the dubious claim that the employee was fired because he or she stopped getting along with their manager. It is natural to assume that a worker-manager relationship would deteriorate if a worker discovered evidence of a crime, reported it to supervisors, and perhaps took the step of informing regulators or the media. In such a scenario, it would be unusual if levels of trust and camaraderie did not diminish. Yet, judges frequently side with employers on this point.

In a series of Tribunal decisions published last year, judges ruled against employees who met the legal definition of “whistleblower” because of:

  • “a decline in the professional relationship”
  • “a mismatch”
  • “poor relationships” and a “dysfunctional situation”
  • “general concerns as to working relationships”
  • “the claimant’s behaviour” and “the working relationship had become untenable”

In one case, a Tribunal judge said an employee met the legal definition of “whistleblower” and was unfairly dismissed. Yet the judge ruled against the person because the “principal reason” for the dismissal was a lack of “mutual trust and confidence.” The judge acknowledged the relationship deteriorated because of the whistleblowing yet still ruled against the employee.

Time for Reform

There are even deeper and more fundamental problems with the UK’s whistleblower protection system.

PIDA’s drafters neglected to include actual mechanisms to stop or even deter reprisals. Because PIDA lacks this authority, it essentially serves as a trap for employees who think they will be shielded from adverse consequences. Rather, what they discover is that the road to compensation and redemption is long, costly, and, at best uncertain.

As proof of PIDA’s lack of protective measures, whistleblowers first must suffer repercussions at work before the benefits of the law kick in. The law only gives employees the opportunity to exercise their rights after they have suffered retaliation – and after their jobs and perhaps their careers have been ruined.

By way of analogy, rather than giving whistleblowers a seat belt to prevent them from being harmed in the first place, PIDA provides an emergency room in hopes of patching up the wounds.

A 2016 study shows PIDA contains only 37 percent of international standards for whistleblower protection legislation. When compared against 26 standards, PIDA scored a “0” in 13 of them, concluded the study by Thomson Reuters Foundation and Blueprint for Free Speech. This is well below what would be expected of the “gold standard” for protecting whistleblowers.

PIDA must be completely overhauled in order to meet these standards. If not, employees will continue to suffer reprisals – simply because they saw something wrong and reported it.

Tags: International WhistleblowersUK whistleblowersWhistleblower Rights
Previous Post

In Memoriam: Judge Stanley Sporkin, the Grandfather of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

Next Post

Rio Tinto Whistleblower Files Complaint with U.S. Regulators

Next Post
Rio Tinto Whistleblower Files Complaint with U.S. Regulators

Rio Tinto Whistleblower Files Complaint with U.S. Regulators

Please login to join discussion

Receive Daily Alerts

Subscribe to receive daily breaking news and legislative developments sent to your inbox.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Most Popular

Whistleblower Advocates Take Issue with New York’s Policy of Favoring Arbitration

Whistleblowers to Receive Up to $920K after Alleging Fraud in Breast Cancer Testing

Supreme Court Upholds, For Now, Trump Firing of MSPB Chair

Whistleblower Suit Leads to $3.3 Million Stark Law Settlement

Paper Outlines Founding Father’s Warnings As Trump Goes After Key Whistleblower Appointees

Whistleblower Receives $5 Million for Exposing California Health System’s Alleged Kickback Scheme

Whistleblower Poll

Whistleblower Poll
Whistleblower Poll

Exclusive Marist Poll: Overwhelming Public Support Among Likely Voters For Increased Whistleblower Protections

byGeoff Schweller
October 6, 2020

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

STAY INFORMED.
Subscribe to receive breaking whistleblower updates.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

About Us

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Careers

Subscribe

  • Daily Mail
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • YouTube Channel

Contribute

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Reprint Guidelines

Your Experience

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Help

  • Rules for Whistleblowers
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Advertise
Whistleblower Network News

Whistleblower Network News is an independent online newspaper providing our readers with up-to-date information on whistleblowing. Our goal is to be the best source of information on important qui tam, anti-corruption, compliance, and whistleblower law developments.

Submit an Article

Copyright © 2025, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

This Newspaper/Web Site is made available by the publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Newspaper/Web Site publisher. The Newspaper/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Become a Whistleblower Network News Subscriber

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Subscribe to WNN

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Subscribe to WNN
Join the Waitlist for National Whistleblower Day 2025! July 30, 2025 on Capitol Hill
JOIN WAITLIST

Add New Playlist

Demand Protections for Artificial Intelligence Whistleblowers

Take Action!
No Result
View All Result
  • Exclusives
  • Government
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Federal Employees
    • Intelligence
  • Corporate
    • CFTC & Commodities
    • Dodd-Frank
    • IRS & Tax
    • SEC & Securities
  • Features
  • Legislation
  • International
    • Foreign Corruption
  • Rewards
  • Whistleblower of the Week
  • Environment & Climate
  • Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Employment
    • Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers
    • Retaliation
    • OSHA
  • Make National Whistleblower Day Permanent
  • Media
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • National Whistleblower Day
  • Whistleblower Poll
  • Whistleblower Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Resources for Locating An Attorney
    • The New Whistleblowers Handbook

Copyright © 2024, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version