• Qui Tam
  • SEC
  • CFTC
  • FCPA
  • Whistleblower Resources
  • FAQS
Subscribe
Donate
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
The Truth at Any Cost.
Qui Tam, Compliance and Anti-Corruption News.
SIGN THE PETITION FOR NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER DAY IN 2023
Whistleblower Network News
  • Qui Tam
  • SEC
  • CFTC
  • FCPA
  • Whistleblower Resources
  • FAQS
Subscribe
Donate
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
No Result
View All Result
Home Corporate

4th Circuit says FCA gives no protection for filing retaliation claims

WNN StaffbyWNN Staff
December 28, 2010
in Corporate, False Claims-Qui Tam, News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail

The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, issued an opinion yesterday that denies protection to employees who file retaliation claims under the False Claims Act (FCA). The three judges ignored the friend-of-the-court brief I submitted that argued how the plain language of the FCA protects all employees who file claims, including claims of retaliation, and how it is in the public interest to protect such whistleblowers.

Jason Mann began working for Heckler & Koch Defense, Inc. (HKD), in 2007 as Manager for Law Enforcement Sales. In 2008, HKD submitted a bid to sell rifles to the Secret Service. The job order called for rifles with “ambilevers” that would allow them to by used by right-handed or left-handed agents. HKD, however, did not have ambilevers, but submitted its bid anyway. HKD rifles also lacked a two-stage trigger. HKD stood to make over 30% profit on the sales. Mann expressed concern about the defects to his supervisor, and began investigating the issue. HKD’s general counsel then announced that Mann should not expect to continue working for HKD. HKD’s CEO ordered all personnel not to cooperate with Mann’s investigation. Mann was placed on administrative leave, denied access to the building, and lost access to his email. HKD’s own investigation found that management had violated federal acquisition rules. On June 11, 2008, Mann filed a complaint in federal court alleging that HKD engaged in retaliation against him in violation of the FCA. The Secret Service rejected HKD’s bid. On July 17, 2008, HKD claimed that Mann had helped a small police department acquire machine guns. It fired Mann using the machine gun issue as its basis.

Support Whistleblower Network News

The Fourth Circuit opinion initially concludes that since HDK had disclosed that its rifles did not meet the Secret Service requirements, HDK did not commit any fraud. It reached this conclusion, in part, by ignoring the language in the bid agreement that said, “The Contractor shall only tender for acceptance those items that conform to the requirements of this contract.” Since HDK disclosed that its rifles did not conform, the Court reasoned, Mann’s belief that there was a fraud was not “reasonable.”

Next, the Court said that the FCA does not protect whistleblowers from retaliation when they file retaliation lawsuits. At 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h), the FCA protects “lawful acts done by the employee . . . in furtherance of an action under this section, including investigation for, initiation of, testimony for, or assistance in an action filed or to be filed under this section.” In Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. United States ex rel. Wilson, 545 U.S. 409, 415 (2005), the Supreme Court considered the phrase “[a] civil action under section 3730” in Section 3731(b), and held that it meant only qui tam actions under Sections 3730(a) and (b), and not retaliation claims under Section 3730(h). The result was that Karen Wilson’s retaliation claim was too late and had to be dismissed. The Fourth Circuit therefore concluded that the phrase “an action under this section” in Section 3730(h) does not include any action under Section 3730(h)! I pointed out that the words “this section” might mean something different when they appear in Section 3731(b). Certainly when Section 3730(h) says “this section,” it should include Section 3730(h). Moreover, it is in the public interest to recognize a whistleblower’s right to protection for assuring that the Secret Service gets only rifles that work as intended. The Fourth Circuit ignored my argument, and did not even discuss my amicus brief in its decision.

The decision is Mann v. Heckler & Koch Defense, Inc., Case No. 09-1847 (4th Cir. 12-27-2010). I filed the amicus brief on behalf of the Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association (MWELA) and the National Whistleblowers Center (NWC). Jason Mann now has two weeks to decide if he will ask the entire Fourth Circuit to rehear this case en banc.

Tags: Corporate WhistleblowersFalse Claims/Qui TamFourth Circuit
Previous Post

Pilot documents security problems, gets investigated

Next Post

Amicus briefs address OSHA complaints and protected activity

WNN Staff

WNN Staff

Next Post

Amicus briefs address OSHA complaints and protected activity

Please login to join discussion

Receive Daily Alerts

Subscribe to receive daily breaking news and legislative developments sent to your inbox.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Most Popular

Change the Culture, Make National Whistleblower Day Permanent

Tell President Biden to “Finish the Job” for Whistleblowers

Whistleblower Advocates See Parallels to Enron in Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

Whistleblower Jóhannes Stefánsson Plans to Testify at Fishrot Trial in Namibia

WNN Exclusive Interview with Social Security Whistleblowers Sarah Carver and Jennifer Griffith — Part 1

Whistleblower Raised Concerns of Rodents, Spiders in Kitchen of Childcare Facility, Then Fired; OSHA Rules They Were Retaliated Against

Whistleblower Poll

Whistleblower Poll
Whistleblower Poll

Exclusive Marist Poll: Overwhelming Public Support Among Likely Voters For Increased Whistleblower Protections

byGeoff Schweller
October 6, 2020

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

STAY INFORMED.
Subscribe to receive breaking whistleblower updates.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

About Us

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Careers

Subscribe

  • Daily Mail
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • YouTube Channel

Contribute

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Reprint Guidelines

Your Experience

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Help

  • The Whistleblowers Handbook
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Advertise
Whistleblower Network News

Whistleblower Network News is an independent online newspaper providing our readers with up-to-date information on whistleblowing. Our goal is to be the best source of information on important qui tam, anti-corruption, compliance, and whistleblower law developments. 

Submit an Article

Copyright © 2021, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

This Newspaper/Web Site is made available by the publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Newspaper/Web Site publisher. The Newspaper/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

SIGN THE PETITION FOR NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER DAY IN 2023
No Result
View All Result
  • Exclusives
  • Government
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Federal Employees
    • Intelligence
  • Corporate
    • CFTC & Commodities
    • Dodd-Frank
    • IRS & Tax
    • SEC & Securities
  • Features
  • Legislation
  • International
    • Foreign Corruption
  • Rewards
  • Whistleblower of the Week
  • Environment & Climate
  • Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Employment
    • Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers
    • Retaliation
    • OSHA
  • Media
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • National Whistleblower Day
  • Whistleblower Poll
  • Whistleblower Resources
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Resources for Locating An Attorney
    • The New Whistleblowers Handbook
  • National Whistleblower Day ’23

Copyright © 2020, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

Become a Whistleblower Network News Subscriber

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Subscribe to WNN

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Subscribe to WNN

Add New Playlist

Go to mobile version