• ABOUT
  • ADVERTISE
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT
Tuesday, January 19, 2021
Subscribe to Newsletter
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
  • Home
  • News
    • Corporate
    • Dodd-Frank
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Foreign Corruption
    • Government
    • Intelligence
    • IRS & Tax
    • Legislation
    • OSHA
    • Sarbanes-Oxley
    • SEC
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Whistleblower of the Week
Whistleblower Network News
  • Home
  • News
    • Corporate
    • Dodd-Frank
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Foreign Corruption
    • Government
    • Intelligence
    • IRS & Tax
    • Legislation
    • OSHA
    • Sarbanes-Oxley
    • SEC
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Whistleblower of the Week
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
No Result
View All Result
Home News SEC

Senators Send Letter to SEC Denouncing Proposed Changes to Whistleblower Program

September 22, 2020
in Corporate, News, SEC
Reading Time: 3min read
0
Senate Letter on SEC Whistleblower Program
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail

Ahead of a pivotal vote on proposed changes to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Whistleblower Program, several U.S. Senators sent a letter to the SEC expressing their concern about the controversial proposals. Whistleblower advocates warn that the proposed changes would undermine the success of the program, and, in their letter, the Senators express similar sentiments.

On September 17, Senators Sherrod Brown, Elizabeth Warren, Chris Van Hollen, Jack Reed, Patrick Leahy, and Christopher A. Coons sent a letter addressed to SEC Chairman Jay Clayton. In the letter, they express their support of the whistleblower program and urge the SEC to not approve changes that could undermine its success. In particular, they point to two controversial proposed rules concerning a “soft cap” on large whistleblower awards and the definition of “original information.”

RelatedPosts

Census Bureau Director Resigns Following Whistleblower Complaint

Biden Picks Gary Gensler to Chair SEC

Drone Manufacturing Company To Pay $25 Million To Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit

Load More

The Senators begin the letter by stating:

Protect Yourself: Purchase the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Purchase the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Purchase the New Whistleblower Handbook

We are concerned that the Commission is considering detrimental revisions to the existing whistleblower rules by adopting the Proposal with significant elements of discretion and uncertainty that would substantially undermine the SEC’s whistleblower program. The Commission must preserve the whistleblower program’s incentives and structure to ensure that it remains effective as a means to uncover fraud and misconduct.

After acknowledging the “unqualified success” of the program, the Senators address two specific proposed rule changes. The Senators denounce a proposed rule that would implement a “soft cap” on the largest whistleblower awards by allowing the SEC to lower the amount of the awards simply due to their size. The Senators state that the SEC must not approve any rule which institutes a cap on whistleblower awards. Moreover, they explain that “cloaking the ability to reduce or limit the dollar amount of an award as an ‘adjustment’ to ‘achieve the goals and interests’ of the whistleblower program is disingenuous and would impair the integrity and proven success of the program. Such an “adjustment” is contrary to Congressional intent, public policy, and the goal of investor protection.”

The other piece of the proposal denounced by the Senators is a rule change that would alter the level of “independent analysis” needed to qualify as “original information” in a whistleblower tip. Whistleblowers must provide “original information” in order to be eligible for a whistleblower award. The Senators write that the proposed change “would permit the SEC to create an insurmountable hurdle for a whistleblower to establish original information based on ‘independent analysis.’” The Senators explain that this vague standard for independent analysis would be a disincentive to whistleblowers and thus “would be contrary to public policy and the legislative purpose of the whistleblower law.”

In conclusion, the Senators write:

At a time when members of Congress have proposed bipartisan legislation to strengthen whistleblower protections, the SEC should not seek to reduce awards or inject uncertainty and ambiguity in the evaluation of whistleblower tips. The SEC should instead work with Congress to protect whistleblowers and ensure that successful tips result in awards as intended under the law.

Read:

The Senators’ Letter

Protect the SEC Whistleblower Program

Tags: SECWhistleblower Rewards
Previous Post

Police Whistleblower Joins Compton Mayor In Claiming Existence Of Brutal Gang In Los Angeles Police Department

Next Post

SEC Whistleblower Receives $2.4 Million Whistleblower Award

Next Post
SEC Whistleblower Record

SEC Whistleblower Receives $2.4 Million Whistleblower Award

Write a Letter to The Editor.

Most Popular

Biden Picks Gary Gensler to Chair SEC

1 day ago

Smart Home Tech Company Settles FIRREA Whistleblower Case With DOJ For $3.2 Million

6 days ago

Deutsche Bank to Pay over $130 Million to Settle FCPA Charges

1 week ago

Taiwan Substantially Increases Awards for Financial Whistleblowers

1 week ago

Department of Labor Awards Delta Air Lines Whistleblower $500,000 in Compensatory Damages

4 days ago

Kim Farrington

1 week ago

Whistleblower Poll

Increased Whistleblower Protections
Legislation

Candidate’s Position on Increased Whistleblower Protections Influences 44% of Likely Voters

byAna Popovich
October 6, 2020
0

Protect Yourself: Buy the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Buy the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Buy the New Whistleblower Handbook

STAY INFORMED. Sign up for daily whistleblower email and social notifications from the Whistleblower Network News.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Qui Tam

  • Dodd-Frank
  • IRS & Tax
  • SEC
  • Foreign Corruption
  • False Claims-Qui Tam

Retaliation

  • OSHA
  • Sarbanes-Oxley

Government

  • Government
  • Intelligence
  • Legislation
  • Veterans

Features

  • Whistleblower of the Week
  • Editorial
  • Features
  • Interviews
  • Opinion

Resources

  • FAQs
  • National Whistleblower Day
  • National Whistleblower Center
  • Whistleblower Handbook
Whistleblower Network News

Whistleblower Network News is an independent online newspaper providing our readers with up-to-date information on whistleblowing. Our goal is to be the best source of information on important qui tam, anti-corruption, compliance, and whistleblower law developments. 

Submit an Article
  • ABOUT
  • ADVERTISE
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT

Copyright © 2020, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

This Newspaper/Web Site is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Newspaper/Web Site publisher. The Newspaper/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Corporate
    • Dodd-Frank
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Foreign Corruption
    • Government
    • Intelligence
    • IRS & Tax
    • Legislation
    • OSHA
    • Sarbanes-Oxley
    • SEC
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Whistleblower of the Week
  • Login

Copyright © 2020, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Facebook
Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Go to mobile version