• ABOUT
  • ADVERTISE
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT
Monday, January 18, 2021
Subscribe to Newsletter
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
  • Home
  • News
    • Corporate
    • Dodd-Frank
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Foreign Corruption
    • Government
    • Intelligence
    • IRS & Tax
    • Legislation
    • OSHA
    • Sarbanes-Oxley
    • SEC
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Whistleblower of the Week
Whistleblower Network News
  • Home
  • News
    • Corporate
    • Dodd-Frank
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Foreign Corruption
    • Government
    • Intelligence
    • IRS & Tax
    • Legislation
    • OSHA
    • Sarbanes-Oxley
    • SEC
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Whistleblower of the Week
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Office of Special Counsel Disagrees with MSPB Ruling in Federal Whistleblower Case

September 9, 2020
in Government, News
Reading Time: 3min read
0
Office of Special Counsel Disagrees with MSPB Ruling in Federal Whistleblower Case

Whistleblower employee concept and whistle blower symbol representing a person in society or a company exposing corruption as a red whistle shaped as a human head in a 3D illustration style.

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail

On August 11, the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) filed an amicus curiae brief arguing against a recent ruling by a Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) administrative judge in a federal whistleblower case. The OSC calls for a reversal of the MSPB’s dismissal of a whistleblower’s retaliation claims, arguing that the MSPB made too narrow of a ruling. The OSC warns that this ruling sets a dangerous precedent for federal whistleblower cases.

The case in question involves Debra Tao, a pharmacist at the Veterans Affairs Department, who alleged she was demoted in response to her making whistleblower disclosures, testifying on behalf of a colleague, and reporting labor violations to the Federal Labor Relations Authority. As a federal employee, Tao is entitled to seek corrective action for retaliation in proceedings before the MSPB through an Individual Right of Action (IRA) appeal. But earlier this year, an MSPB administrative judge ruled against Tao’s IRA appeal, stating that she did not have a reasonable belief that the wrongdoing Tao disclosed evidenced a violation of law. Federal whistleblower protections, as outlined in U.S. Code Section 2302(b)(8), require whistleblowers to disclose violations of law in order to be protected. Tao appealed the decision.

RelatedPosts

Drone Manufacturing Company To Pay $25 Million For Making False Claims, Using Recycled Drone Parts

Department of Labor Awards Delta Air Lines Whistleblower $500,000 in Compensatory Damages

SEC Sets New Record for Money Awarded to Whistleblowers in a Fiscal Year

Load More

In their brief, the OSC requests that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reverse the decision. The OSC argues that the MSPB made too narrow of a ruling and committed reversible error in the case. According to the OSC, the MSPB failed to analyze Tao’s retaliation claim under U.S. Code Section 2302(b)9, which includes two separately-defined provisions prohibiting retaliation for making a protected disclosure or engaging ina protected activity. Section 2302(b)9 differs from Section 2302(b)8 by covering a broader range of protected actions and by having different legal standards. Whereas Section 2302(b)8 requires complainants to have a reasonable belief that their disclosures evidence a violation of law, Section 2302 imposes no such requirement.

Protect Yourself: Purchase the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Purchase the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Purchase the New Whistleblower Handbook

Thus, the OSC argues, the MSPB committed an error by not recognizing that Tao’s complaint is valid according to Section 2302(b)9 because she was retaliated against for partaking in protected actions. In their brief, the OSC stated that the MSPB’s “legal analysis contradicts the plain text of federal whistleblower statutes and neglects Congress’s purpose and intent to provide broad IRA appeal rights against retaliation both for making whistleblower disclosures as well as for engaging in activities related to whistleblowing.” The OSC adds that the MSPB’s “improper approach here is not in accordance with law and leaves federal employees uncertain about their IRA appeal rights under civil service laws and vulnerable to retaliation explicitly prohibited by the statute.”

The OSC enforces whistleblower protection laws for federal workers. The main law which protects federal whistleblowers is the Whistleblower Protection Act. Originally passed in 1978, the bill was amended in 1989, 1994, and 2012 in order to fix problems which made it ineffective. However, due to a lack of incentive awards and access to federal jury trials for whistleblowers, the legislation is not as strong as the whistleblower laws that protect most corporate employees.

Read the OSC’s amicus curiae brief.

Tags: Federal Employee Whistleblowers
Previous Post

Department of Labor Orders Trucking Company to Reinstate Truck Driver

Next Post

Whistleblower Disclosure Exposes University of Manitoba Senior Employee’s Financial Wrongdoing

Next Post
Whistleblower Disclosure Exposes University of Manitoba Senior Employee’s Financial Wrongdoing

Whistleblower Disclosure Exposes University of Manitoba Senior Employee’s Financial Wrongdoing

Write a Letter to The Editor.

Most Popular

Deutsche Bank to Pay over $130 Million to Settle FCPA Charges

1 week ago

Kim Farrington

7 days ago

Smart Home Tech Company Settles FIRREA Whistleblower Case With DOJ For $3.2 Million

5 days ago

President-elect Biden Nominates William J. Burns as Head of CIA

6 days ago

Taiwan Substantially Increases Awards for Financial Whistleblowers

6 days ago

Whistleblower to Receive $480,000 in Settlement, Lawyer Explains the Case

5 days ago

Whistleblower Poll

Increased Whistleblower Protections
Legislation

Candidate’s Position on Increased Whistleblower Protections Influences 44% of Likely Voters

byAna Popovich
October 6, 2020
0

Protect Yourself: Buy the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Buy the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Buy the New Whistleblower Handbook

STAY INFORMED. Sign up for daily whistleblower email and social notifications from the Whistleblower Network News.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Qui Tam

  • Dodd-Frank
  • IRS & Tax
  • SEC
  • Foreign Corruption
  • False Claims-Qui Tam

Retaliation

  • OSHA
  • Sarbanes-Oxley

Government

  • Government
  • Intelligence
  • Legislation
  • Veterans

Features

  • Whistleblower of the Week
  • Editorial
  • Features
  • Interviews
  • Opinion

Resources

  • FAQs
  • National Whistleblower Day
  • National Whistleblower Center
  • Whistleblower Handbook
Whistleblower Network News

Whistleblower Network News is an independent online newspaper providing our readers with up-to-date information on whistleblowing. Our goal is to be the best source of information on important qui tam, anti-corruption, compliance, and whistleblower law developments. 

Submit an Article
  • ABOUT
  • ADVERTISE
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT

Copyright © 2020, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

This Newspaper/Web Site is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Newspaper/Web Site publisher. The Newspaper/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Corporate
    • Dodd-Frank
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Foreign Corruption
    • Government
    • Intelligence
    • IRS & Tax
    • Legislation
    • OSHA
    • Sarbanes-Oxley
    • SEC
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Whistleblower of the Week
  • Login

Copyright © 2020, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Facebook
Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Go to mobile version