• Government
  • Legislation
  • False Claims
  • Corporate
    • Dodd-Frank
    • IRS & Tax
    • SEC
    • Sarbanes-Oxley
  • OSHA
  • Environment
  • Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
The Truth at Any Cost.
Whistleblower Network News
No Result
View All Result
Home Corporate

Whistleblowers Get Some Good News in Genberg v. Porter

WNN StaffbyWNN Staff
February 23, 2018
in Corporate, News
Reading Time: 3min read
0
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail

Following Wednesday’s devastating Supreme Court decision in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, whistleblowers were in need of some good news. The Tenth Circuit answered the call yesterday with a solid decision in Gensberg v. Porter affirming an amicus brief submitted by the National Whistleblower Center.

Carl Genberg was an executive for the Ceregenix Corporation who suspected misconduct by the Board of Directors. When he suspected misconduct including insider training, he reported this to the Board. As a result of his actions, Genberg was fired. Yet when he brought a whistleblower suit before a federal district court, the judge dismissed his case upon a summary judgment motion by Ceregenix.

In reaching its decision, the District Court claimed that whistleblower reports needed to be “definitive and specific.” Yet this was the wrong standard. A quarter-century ago the Third Circuit ruled in in Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners v. Department of Labor that whistleblowers only need to have a reasonable belief that their claims amount to a violation of the law. In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley law (SOX) was passed in wake of the Enron and Worldcom scandals, and the Senate Judiciary Committee stated in its final legislative report that the Passaic Valley standard protecting any “non-frivolous” report should control in a Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower case.

Alas, big corporate interest groups like the Chamber of Commerce did not concede defeat. Instead, courts around the country pushed for the “definitive and specific” standard, which makes it much harder for whistleblowers to get their cases to the trial stage. A surprising and disturbing number of decisions ignored the reasonableness language and adopted the “definitive and specific” standard.

The National Whistleblower Center counterpunched in a case before the Administrative Review Board and won an important victory, firmly establishing the Department of Labor standard, namely whether a whistleblower “reasonably believes” a violation of law has been committed. Moreover, DOL specifically rejected the “definitive and specific” language.

But some discredited ideas just don’t die, and the District Court in Colorado revived “definitive and specific” again. Genberg appealed the decision, and NWC again responded with an amicus brief explaining why the Tenth Circuit must use the “reasonably believes” standard.

The Tenth Circuit agreed. It explained the “statement of the burden [put forth by the District Court] was incorrect, for the Administrative Review Board of the Department of Labor has explicitly disavowed the definitive and specific evidentiary standard” (internal quotations omitted).

Stephen M. Kohn, the National Whistleblower Center’s executive director who submitted the amicus brief in Genberg v. Porter stated, “corporations must stop retaliating and start listening to their whistleblowers. The Tenth Circuit reaffirmed basic rules of law governing SOX. These rules were drafted to help whistleblowers report wrongdoing, not to help the corporation’s cover-up fraud. The culture of shooting the messenger must end. We are proud to have supported Mr. Genberg in this very important case.”


For more information:

  • NWC Amicus Brief in Genberg v. Porter 
  • 10th Circuit Decision in Genberg v. Porter
Protect Yourself: Purchase the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Purchase the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Purchase the New Whistleblower Handbook
Tags: Corporate WhistleblowersDepartment of LaborWhistleblowerWhistleblower LawsWhistleblower ProtectionWhistleblower Protections
WNN Staff

WNN Staff

Write a Letter to The Editor.

Most Popular

Important Alert for Wildlife Conservation and Anti-Trafficking NGOs

SDG #16 Through the Lens of Wildlife Crimes 

Two SEC Whistleblowers Receive Over $500,000

WNN Hosts Free Webinar Celebrating Anniversary of False Claims Act

Whistleblower Advocates Launch GoFundMe Campaign for Fishrot Whistleblower Jóhannes Stefánsson

Jóhannes Stefánsson

Whistleblower Poll

Increased Whistleblower Protections
Legislation

Candidate’s Position on Increased Whistleblower Protections Influences 44% of Likely Voters

byAna Popovich
October 6, 2020

Protect Yourself: Buy the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Buy the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Buy the New Whistleblower Handbook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

STAY INFORMED. Sign up for daily whistleblower email and social notifications from the Whistleblower Network News.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Qui Tam

  • Dodd-Frank
  • IRS & Tax
  • SEC
  • Foreign Corruption
  • False Claims-Qui Tam

Retaliation

  • OSHA
  • Sarbanes-Oxley

Government

  • Government
  • Intelligence
  • Legislation
  • Veterans

Features

  • Whistleblower of the Week
  • Editorial
  • Features
  • Interviews
  • Opinion

Resources

  • FAQs
  • National Whistleblower Day
  • National Whistleblower Center
  • Whistleblower Handbook
Whistleblower Network News

Whistleblower Network News is an independent online newspaper providing our readers with up-to-date information on whistleblowing. Our goal is to be the best source of information on important qui tam, anti-corruption, compliance, and whistleblower law developments. 

Submit an Article
  • ABOUT
  • ADVERTISE
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT

Copyright © 2021, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

This Newspaper/Web Site is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Newspaper/Web Site publisher. The Newspaper/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

No Result
View All Result
  • Government
  • Legislation
  • False Claims
  • Corporate
    • Dodd-Frank
    • IRS & Tax
    • SEC
    • Sarbanes-Oxley
  • OSHA
  • Environment
  • Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Login

Copyright © 2020, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Facebook
Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Go to mobile version