• ABOUT
  • ADVERTISE
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT
Thursday, January 21, 2021
Subscribe to Newsletter
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
  • Home
  • News
    • Corporate
    • Dodd-Frank
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Foreign Corruption
    • Government
    • Intelligence
    • IRS & Tax
    • Legislation
    • OSHA
    • Sarbanes-Oxley
    • SEC
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Whistleblower of the Week
Whistleblower Network News
  • Home
  • News
    • Corporate
    • Dodd-Frank
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Foreign Corruption
    • Government
    • Intelligence
    • IRS & Tax
    • Legislation
    • OSHA
    • Sarbanes-Oxley
    • SEC
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Whistleblower of the Week
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Network News
No Result
View All Result
Home News Corporate

SEC Protects Access to Whistleblower Rewards

Farhat MuruwatbyFarhat Muruwat
January 23, 2017
in Corporate, News, SEC
Reading Time: 3min read
0
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInEmail

On January 17, 2017, the SEC issued its latest sanction, a $340,000 penalty against BlackRock Inc., (NYSE: BLK — the world’s largest investment management firm) for interfering with the right of its employees to obtain whistleblower rewards under the SEC’s Dodd-Frank Act whistleblower reward program. SEC Rule 21F-17 was adopted in response to the whistleblower reward provisions found in the Dodd-Frank Act. Rule 21F-17 forbids a covered employer from taking “any action to impede an individual from communicating directly with the Commission staff about a possible securities law violation.”

The enforcement test case for a Rule 21F-17 enforcement action came in response to the February 19, 2014 complaint Kohn Kohn & Colapinto, LLP (KKC) filed against the giant government contracting firm KBR Inc. While litigating against KBR the firm documented an entrenched practice at KBR that forced all of its employees with knowledge of fraud to sign non-disclosure agreements that threaten them with termination if they chose to reveal fraud allegations to anyone outside of KBR’s legal department. The SEC took enforcement action on that complaint on April 1, 2015 and issued the first penalty against any company for attempting to silence a whistleblower. KBR was forced to pay a $130,000 penalty and agreed to cease this practice. The KBR enforcement action was widely applauded and served as the springboard for the series of related enforcement actions that followed.

RelatedPosts

Whistleblower Complaint Leads to SEC Investigation of Exxon

Biden and Harris’ Histories on Whistleblowing

Blowing the Whistle on Illegal Fishing: A UN Webinar

Load More

In June 2016, an enforcement action was issued against Merrill Lynch for prohibiting its employees from disclosing confidential information “except pursuant to formal legal process or unless the former employee first obtained the written approval” from Merrill Lynch for the disclosure. In August 2016 the SEC, penalized Health Net Inc. $340,000 for including it its severance agreements a prohibition that prevented employees from being able to obtain a monetary reward under SEC’s whistleblower program. Blue Linx Holdings was also penalized $265,000 when the company had departing employees waive their right to recover a reward for any whistleblower complaints to be filed. In September 2016, the SEC hit Anheuser-Busch In Bev with a $6 million fine for engaging in misconduct under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act that included the unlawful attempt to impeded a whistleblower from reporting misconduct. In December 2017 SEC issued a $1.4 million penalty against SandRidge Energy Inc. for retaliating against a whistleblower who refused to sign an illegal confidentiality agreement and that same month issued a cease and desist order and fined NeuStar Inc. $180,000 for violating the risk alert issued to all advisers and brokers on October 24, 2016.

Protect Yourself: Purchase the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Purchase the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Purchase the New Whistleblower Handbook

Well before KKC’s efforts to get the SEC to police the use of restrictive non-disclosure agreements, KKC successfully led the efforts to outlaw a similar practice that was occurring in the nuclear industry. In the late 1980’s nuclear whistleblowers were silenced with restrictive agreements that forbid the raising of safety concerns to government regulators, which was the norm of the industry in those days. KKC’s work in this area resulted in a nationwide ban on restrictive settlements in all federal nuclear and environmental cases, requiring government approval to ensure the right of employees to blow the whistle on safety and environmental issues was not compromised during the settlement process.

Farhat Muruwat

Farhat Muruwat

Write a Letter to The Editor.

Most Popular

No Content Available

Whistleblower Poll

Increased Whistleblower Protections
Legislation

Candidate’s Position on Increased Whistleblower Protections Influences 44% of Likely Voters

byAna Popovich
October 6, 2020
0

Protect Yourself: Buy the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Buy the New Whistleblower Handbook Protect Yourself: Buy the New Whistleblower Handbook

STAY INFORMED. Sign up for daily whistleblower email and social notifications from the Whistleblower Network News.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Qui Tam

  • Dodd-Frank
  • IRS & Tax
  • SEC
  • Foreign Corruption
  • False Claims-Qui Tam

Retaliation

  • OSHA
  • Sarbanes-Oxley

Government

  • Government
  • Intelligence
  • Legislation
  • Veterans

Features

  • Whistleblower of the Week
  • Editorial
  • Features
  • Interviews
  • Opinion

Resources

  • FAQs
  • National Whistleblower Day
  • National Whistleblower Center
  • Whistleblower Handbook
Whistleblower Network News

Whistleblower Network News is an independent online newspaper providing our readers with up-to-date information on whistleblowing. Our goal is to be the best source of information on important qui tam, anti-corruption, compliance, and whistleblower law developments. 

Submit an Article
  • ABOUT
  • ADVERTISE
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS OF USE
  • CAREERS
  • CONTACT

Copyright © 2020, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

This Newspaper/Web Site is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this website, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Newspaper/Web Site publisher. The Newspaper/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Corporate
    • Dodd-Frank
    • False Claims-Qui Tam
    • Foreign Corruption
    • Government
    • Intelligence
    • IRS & Tax
    • Legislation
    • OSHA
    • Sarbanes-Oxley
    • SEC
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Whistleblower of the Week
  • Login

Copyright © 2020, Whistleblower Network News. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
Sign In with Google
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Facebook
Sign Up with Google
OR

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
Go to mobile version