The Maryland Senate yesterday passed a state version of the False Claims Act (FCA) by a vote of 37 in favor and 8 against. Before passing this bill, however, the Senate watered it down with an amendment. The Maryland False Health Claims Act of 2010, SB 279, as amended, no longer allows the state (or a whistleblower acting on behalf of the state) to obtain compensatory damages. The amendment also requires a court to dismiss the action if the State of Maryland declines to intervene. The Senate’s amendment also waters down the provision for attorney fees. It now provides that attorney’s fees and costs “may” be allowed by the court, and that the court must consider the amount of penalties and damages recovered. This last provision is contrary to prevailing law that calls on courts to award attorney fees based on market rates, without regard to any proportionality to the amount of recovery. The Senate’s bill also allows courts to reduce the amount of the whistleblower’s recovery if the court finds that the whistleblower participated in the violation. A more enlightened view would have barred recovery only if the person caused the violation through actions other than following orders of a superior. Also, I mentioned before that Maryland could gain even more if this bill covered all frauds, and not just those arising in medical care programs. Perhaps the Maryland House will consider these shortcomings when its Judiciary and Appropriations committee conducts the bill at its first hearing on April 1. The Senate bill does include an anti-retaliation provision, Section 2-607, that would allow employees to sue if they suffer retaliation for participating in a lawsuit, objecting to a violation, or refusing to participate in a violation. According to a Baltimore Sun article, the state administration estimates that between 5 and 10 percent of the state’s $6 billion in annual medical spending is lost in fraudulent claims. The article quotes a spokesperson for the hospital association as saying that the amendment would cost the state the extra 10% it would receive from federal false claims lawsuits in the state. This refers to the Grassley Amendment to the federal FCA which increases a state’s share if the state’s law meets certain minimum requirements. Apparently, making hospital administrators happy is more important to Maryland’s Senators than protecting taxpayer dollars.
Maryland Senate passes watered-down state False Health Claims Act
- WNN Staff
- Categories: Employment, False Claims-Qui Tam, News, Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers
- Tags: False Claims/Qui TamLegislationPharmaceuticals
Related Content
Qui Tam Whistleblower Awarded Nearly $4 Million After Alleging Improper Billing by UCHealth
By
Geoff Schweller
November 20, 2024
Whistleblowers’ Allegations of Kickbacks Results in $47 Million False Claims Act Settlement
By
Geoff Schweller
November 19, 2024
Supreme Court Appears Ready to Side With Whistleblower in False Claims Act Case
By
Geoff Schweller
November 12, 2024
Healthcare Fraud Whistleblower Suit Against Texas Optometrist Results in $1 Million Settlement
By
Geoff Schweller
November 8, 2024